Comments on: Put Up Or Shut Up

By: Perplexed

Perplexed — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:03:16 +0000

BF: I have to say, you seem incredibly incensed by the civil suit initiated – you’ve mentioned it a couple of times completely out of context. To the point where your comments are coming across as strangely attacking on the next known victim – Kathy. And yet I am still trying to figure out the connection to the murder.

It’s also interesting that you are unable to seemingly begin from an unbiased perspective, but instead start from a defense stance of the trouple. And finally you are obsessed over whether RW had “secrets” – as though even if he did, they would be remotely relevant to the murder.

Maybe it’s a case of being too close to the defendants – maybe it’s a case of being unable to understand something from perspective/experience other than your own. In either case, your postings are more telling than you probably imagined they would be.

By: CDinDC

CDinDC — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:53:51 +0000

Fortunately, motive does not have to be proven in a court of law.

By: JusticeForRobert

JusticeForRobert — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:05:11 +0000

Yes, both motive and logic are in the minds of the beholders. Evidence, some of which has been lost, will play a very important role in justice with this case. I do not doubt that some justice will be delivered, perhaps the most important will be poetic justice.

By: BenFranklin

BenFranklin — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:21:06 +0000

JFR-I guess it’s the disconnect between motive and logic that makes this an evidence case.

Ben

By: Clio

Clio — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:34:59 +0000

I agree with Nelly, but, touche, SKS.

As Harold said in the movie “Boys in the Band” over forty years ago, “is that the pot calling the kettle beige?” Why beige? It was the avant garde color of the kitchen cookwear of urban sophisticates and limosine liberals at the end of the Great Society.

By: CDinDC

CDinDC — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:19:27 +0000

By the say SKS….any word from our favorite roomie?

(PS…your little “smack down” comment made me laugh, so my retort was in good humor. Doesn’t always translate well online, so I thought I’d clarify.)

By: Bea

Bea — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:18:22 +0000

Don’t forget, too, that the ‘bogeyman’ from Craigslist of recent fame was a second year medical student at Boston University and was engaged to be married to another med student (I believe). Getting into med school isn’t easy (by a stretch) and I’m sure he had no priors yet is now charged with one murder and several robberies/assaults.

By: CDinDC

CDinDC — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:09:51 +0000

Ben, please in the future before you express that one group of people are capable or incapable of doing or not doing something, please think about it before you hit “submit comment.” Those kinds of remarks are completely discriminatory.

You can’t express categorically that “smart guys” don’t commit crime.

By: CDinDC

CDinDC — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:59:49 +0000

AZ, the authorities brought up JP’s drug use in court. And from what I can remember, the defense was a bit steamed about it. Not to mention the “hounds” hit on drug residue in two places in the house. So, their “alleged” drug use has basis.

By: CDinDC

CDinDC — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:39 +0000

Is the pot calling the kettle black, SKS?