RIDICULOUS
Two & half years after the killing of Robert Wone,
authorities appear not to have enough evidence
for the indictment of Ward, Price or Zaborsky.
Though I have been both prosecutor & defense
lawyer, I am not in any position to prove guilt or innocence. What I can say is highly unusual has
been publication of affidavit itemizing evidence
suggesting guilt of any crime by any person in any
case. While it is true that affidavit does not prove
guilt, I believe I believe publication of affidavit by
law enforcement authorties a/w/a Kathy Wone’s
institution of civil suit prior to the conclusion of
the criminal case are gambits to persuade one or
more of Swann Street residents to come forward
with any evidence bearing on the case of which
they may be aware. I don’t know what they know.

Published affidavit does not tell us which — if any -
- of those in question may be guilty of murder tho
affidavit does suggest obstruction of justice as well
as evidence tampering. Even those charges have
yet to be proved though affidavit would probably
not have been drafted — let alone published — if
authorities did not believe it provided reasonable
evidence of guilt. That does not prove charges.

JACKSON
Though it is true that Wone wore mouth guard as matter of course, the introduction of item raises
question as to whether Robert was anticipating
sexual encounter. Many people — Straight as well
as Gay — do not find mouth guards particularly
appealing when it comes to engaging in oral sex.

However, I could see that some S&Mers might be
“turned on” by bite plate clenching sexual organ &
thereby causing desirable degree of pain. My not
being expert on the subject of S&M, I do not know
the extent of this practice. Perhaps others could
enlighten us about the popularity of technique.

CONNECT THE DOTS
Admittedly, I share skepticism of many regarding
the intruder theory. I have expounded on this
subject elsewhere in another post. Most of my
hypotheses about this case were expressed prior to
release of evidence following murder & therefore
were uninfluenced by same. That does not make
me correct in this or any other of my theories.
However, I do think it worth noting that at time
Ward, Price and Zaborsky first advanced intruder
theory — when police first arrived on the scene –
even Ward, Price and Zaborsky stated that they
regarded their own assertion that intruder was
responsible as “implausible. Though I happen to
agree with the three gentleman in this, please note
that has consistently been “their” characterization!

darling, your disgust is so misplaced.

one would hope that you would be most disgusted at the person (s) responsible for this murder and/or its cover-up. this site seeks to shine a light on these persons; including but not limited to those who are currently charged with participating in a cover-up conspiracy. sweetheart, tell us of the disgust you have for ms. joe price, who has allegedly done very little to assist you and your friends in finding the real killer. are you more disgusted with price; or with those interested in solving the case. you gave us your opinion on the bloggers, now sit on the couch and tell us what you feel in your head and heart about the three men currently charged. the floor is your, connect the dots . . . was yours just a drive-by posting, or do you have an interest in answers?

Given my background in academia, training as a lawyer and life of human rights activism, that is what people seem to have always said about me!

If, however, the body was laid out according to this drawing, with the left foot tucked behind the right ankle, and the index fingers on both hands outstretched / pointing – then yeah, that’s pretty damn significant.

My feeling about it:

Moreover, it wouldn’t be a leap to speculate about why Dylan Ward would be interested in reading such an article. [...]
Whether or not this article had anything to do with Robert Wone’s murder is up for debate. [...]
take a look and see if there is anything to this piece evidence cited by MPD.

I think that “why Dylan Ward would be interested” is simple enough to explain: he’s the sort of intellectual who reads the New Yorker, so he’s likely to want to read the articles in it in general and a John Updike article in particular.

It seems like it’d be nothing more than a coincidence, unless there’s specific reason to think it’s not. According to the MPD, the reason it’s relevant is that the body in the illustration is “positioned similar to the way Mr. Wone’s body was positioned when it was found”. Now that I know that the drawing’s by Ralph Steadman, I’m not sure how you’d get anybody into that pose without breaking half their bones…. But in truth, if the key fact here is that the pose in the illustration and the pose Wone was found in are similar, the illustration on its own isn’t helpful in judging the situation. Is there a real similarity, or was the MPD reading too much into it?