Trace blood evidence…..does this mean a scant amount of evidence? Was the trace blood evidence smears, such as accidental rubbing against a wall or door frame? Or was the trace evidence consistent with blood spattering? Was the evidence isolated to the room Mr. Wone was found in? Did the investigators find any evidence that Mr. Wone was in another bedroom? A few questions for consideration.

I’ve often thought Mr. Wone was placed in the shower to wash away any physical evidence of a sexual assault, stabbed in the bathroom and then returned to the guestroom, where he expired. His bleeding would have slowed as his system began to shut down. Any major bleeding would have been washed away in the shower, and perhaps the “trace evidence” would have been a result of bringing him back into the guestroom. Just a thought.

What is your theory?

Please do not misunderstand my prior posts… I personally believe the defendants are guilty (of at least covering up a murder and probably the murder itself), but in the interest of full discussion, I was merely raising a question.

There already is blood evidence that there was
cleaning up in the Townhouse right after the killing.

No it doesn’t. I am speaking for myself. I do not know anything about their psychology.
Some people can and do live with something like this on their conscience – at least for awhile.

If for no other reason the wife deserves closure.

If I were one of those 3 men I would tell the truth.
I would see no point in living with myself without doing so. My life would lose all meaning if I continued to go on covering it up. This is not about beating the system. And obviously Robert can not be brought back. But if one or more of them are responsbile what would be the point of getting away with it? So you can live as “free” men. Prison would be nothing compared with carrying around a powerful, crushing, soul destroying secret like that.